Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35743740›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Imaging Severity COVID-19 Assessment in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients: Comparison of the Different Variants in a High Volume Italian Reference Center.

Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Alberta Villanacci, Simona Magliocchetti, Fabrizio Urraro, Nardi Tetaj, Luisa Marchioni, Fabrizio Albarello, Paolo Campioni, Massimo Cristofaro and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy.
Alberta VillanacciDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.
Simona MagliocchettiDivision of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80128 Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio UrraroDivision of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2284-0855
Nardi TetajIntensive Care Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-4855
Luisa MarchioniIntensive Care Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio AlbarelloDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-709X
Paolo CampioniDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7275-7358
Massimo CristofaroDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0224-5760
Federica Di StefanoDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-2392
Nicoletta FuscoDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.
Ada PetroneDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3413-4475
Vincenzo SchininàDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0079-2522
Francesca GrassiDivision of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80128 Naples, Italy.
Enrico GirardiDepartment of Epidemiology and Research, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8182-5896
Stefania IannielloDiagnostic Imaging of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITIGEA Clinical Biophysics (Italy) · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, based on CT findings in critically ill patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Patients were selected by ICU database considering the period from December 2021 to 23 March 2022, according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with proven Omicron variant COVID-19 infection with known COVID-19 vaccination with at least two doses and with chest Computed Tomography (CT) study during ICU hospitalization. Wee also evaluated the ICU database considering the period from March 2020 to December 2021, to select unvaccinated consecutive patients with Alpha variant, subjected to CT study, consecutive unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with Delta variant, subjected to CT study, and, consecutive unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, subjected to CT study. CT images were evaluated qualitatively using a severity score scale of 5 levels (none involvement, mild: ≤25% of involvement, moderate: 26−50% of involvement, severe: 51−75% of involvement, and critical involvement: 76−100%) and quantitatively, using the Philips IntelliSpace Portal clinical application CT COPD computer tool. For each patient the lung volumetry was performed identifying the percentage value of aerated residual lung volume. Non-parametric tests for continuous and categorical variables were performed to assess statistically significant differences among groups. Results: The patient study group was composed of 13 vaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron V). As control groups we identified: 20 unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant (Alpha NV); 20 unvaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta NV); 18 vaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta V); and 20 unvaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron NV). No differences between the groups under examination were found (p value > 0.05 at Chi square test) in terms of risk factors (age, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, immunosuppression, chronic kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and liver disease, etc.). A different median value of aerated residual lung volume was observed in the Delta variant groups: median value of aerated residual lung volume was 46.70% in unvaccinated patients compared to 67.10% in vaccinated patients. In addition, in patients with Delta variant every other extracted volume by automatic tool showed a statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated group. Statistically significant differences were observed for each extracted volume by automatic tool between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant of COVID-19. Good statistically significant correlations among volumes extracted by automatic tool for each lung lobe and overall radiological severity score were obtained (ICC range 0.71−0.86). GGO was the main sign of COVID-19 lesions on CT images found in 87 of the 91 (95.6%) patients. No statistically significant differences were observed in CT findings (ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidation or crazy paving sign) among patient groups. Conclusion: In our study, we showed that in critically ill patients no difference were observed in terms of severity of disease or exitus, between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. The only statistically significant differences were observed, with regard to the severity of COVID-19 pulmonary parenchymal involvement, between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant, and between unvaccinated patients with Delta variant and vaccinated patients with Delta variant.

Indexed as

Computed TomographyCOVID-19vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35743740
PMCPMC9224665
OpenAlexW4281832576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.