Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35743670›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

MDMF: Predicting miRNA-Disease Association Based on Matrix Factorization with Disease Similarity Constraint.

Jihwan Ha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanism Analysis of the Effect of Cordycepin on Colorectal CancerCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jihwan HaMajor of Big Data Convergence, Division of Data Information Science, Pukyoung National University, Busan 48513, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6086-5693

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1G1A1003616Pukyong National University 202126850001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have drawn enormous attention owing to their significant roles in various biological processes, as well as in the pathogenesis of human diseases. Therefore, predicting miRNA-disease associations is a pivotal task for the early diagnosis and better understanding of disease pathogenesis. To date, numerous computational frameworks have been proposed to identify potential miRNA-disease associations without escalating the costs and time required for clinical experiments. In this regard, I propose a novel computational framework (MDMF) for identifying potential miRNA-disease associations using matrix factorization with a disease similarity constraint. To evaluate the performance of MDMF, I calculated the area under the ROC curve (AUCs) in the framework of global and local leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). In conclusion, MDMF achieved reliable AUC values of 0.9147 and 0.8905 for global and local LOOCV, respectively, which was a significant improvement upon the previous methods. Additionally, case studies were conducted on two major human cancers (breast cancer and lung cancer) to validate the effectiveness of MDMF. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate that MDMF not only discovers miRNA-disease associations efficiently but also deciphers the underlying roles of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of diseases at a system level.

Indexed as

diseasematrix factorizationmicroRNAmiRNA–disease association

Identifiers

PMID35743670
PMCPMC9224864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.