ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Novel Anterior Cranial Base Area for Voxel-Based Superimposition of Craniofacial CBCTs.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Facial Surface Models Generated from Repeated CT and CBCT Scans: An Ex Vivo Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reliability and reproducibility of CBCT assessment of craniomaxillary changes before and after treatment for Class III growing patients - a cautious or critical approach.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Accuracy of anterior cranial base surfaces acquired from computed tomography imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 3D palatal superimposition in adolescent orthodontic patients treated without extractions: method validation.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Digital setup accuracy for moderate crowding correction with fixed orthodontic appliances: a prospective study.Progress in orthodontics · 2024Article
- Accuracy of facial skeletal surfaces segmented from CT and CBCT radiographs.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Precision of a Hand-Held 3D Surface Scanner in Dry and Wet Skeletal Surfaces: An Ex Vivo Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A standard method to assess changes in craniofacial morphology over time is through the superimposition of serial patient images. This study evaluated the reliability of a novel anterior cranial base reference area, principally including stable midline structures (EMACB) after an early age, and compared it to the total anterior cranial base (TACB) and an area including only midline structures (MACB). Fifteen pairs of pre-existing serial CBCT images acquired from growing patients were superimposed with all techniques by applying a best-fit registration algorithm of corresponding voxel intensities (Dolphin 3D software). The research outcomes were the reproducibility of each technique and the agreement between them in skeletal change detection, as well as their validity. The TACB and EMACB methods were valid, since the superimposed midline ACB structures consistently showed adequate overlap. They also presented perfect overall reproducibility (median error < 0.01 mm) and agreement (median difference < 0.01 mm). MACB showed reduced validity, higher errors, and a moderate agreement to the TACB. Thus, the EMACB method performed efficiently and mainly included the stable midline ACB structures during growth. Based on the technical, anatomical, and biological principles applied when superimposing serial 3D data to assess craniofacial changes, we recommend the EMACB method as the method of choice to fulfil this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.