Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35743588›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Ocular Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL Preservative-Free versus Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with Benzalkonium Chloride or Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL Preservative-Free in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Mariaelena Filippelli, Giuseppe Campagna, Nicola Ciampa, Gaetano Fioretto, Roberta Giannini, Pier Franco Marino, Roberto dell'Omo, Ciro Costagliola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mariaelena FilippelliDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1950-0200
Giuseppe CampagnaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1884-9171
Nicola CiampaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Gaetano FiorettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9221-5775
Roberta GianniniDepartment of Ophthalmology, San Camillo Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Pier Franco MarinoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Roberto dell'OmoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-8874
Ciro CostagliolaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8477-6188
University of Molise · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate whether the therapeutic switch from a formulation of Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with benzalkonium chloride (BAK) or Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL preservative-free to a formulation of Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free could improve eye surface conditions in patients with glaucoma; intraocular pressure (IOP) was also evaluated. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria were eligible for the therapeutic switch to Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free. At each check visit, enrolled patients underwent a break-up time (BUT) test, an ocular surface disease index (OSDI) test, and a three-point tonometric curve. A total of 40 patients were enrolled (23 were in therapy with Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with BAK and 17 with Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL preservative-free). Significant differences of OSDI and BUT between Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with BAK at baseline vs. Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free at 14 and 28 days (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively) were recorded. Similarly, significant differences of OSDI and BUT between Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL preservative-free at baseline vs. Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free at 14 and 28 days (p < 0.0001 for both) were found. Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free has a better tolerability profile associated with non-therapeutical inferiority in the control of IOP compared to the other Bimatoprost formulations.

Indexed as

benzalkonium chloridebimatoprostbreak-up time (BUT) testintraocular pressure (IOP)ocular surface disease index (OSDI)primary open-angle glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID35743588
PMCPMC9224644
OpenAlexW4283123853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.