Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35743577›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Intracholecystic versus Intravenous Indocyanine Green (ICG) Injection for Biliary Anatomy Evaluation by Fluorescent Cholangiography during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Case-Control Study.

Lidia Castagneto-Gissey, Maria Francesca Russo, Alessandra Iodice, James Casella-Mariolo, Angelo Serao, Andrea Picchetto, Giancarlo D'Ambrosio, Irene Urciuoli, Alessandro De Luca, Bruno Salvati and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lidia Castagneto-GisseyDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3800-167X
Maria Francesca RussoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra IodiceDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0785-9454
James Casella-MarioloDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale dei Castelli (NOC), ASL Roma 6, 00040 Rome, Italy.
Angelo SeraoDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale dei Castelli (NOC), ASL Roma 6, 00040 Rome, Italy.
Andrea PicchettoDepartment of General Surgery, Surgical Specialties and Organ Transplantation, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-9286
Giancarlo D'AmbrosioDepartment of General Surgery, Surgical Specialties and Organ Transplantation, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Irene UrciuoliDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7591-5414
Alessandro De LucaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Bruno SalvatiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giovanni CasellaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITASL Roma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Fluorescence cholangiography has been proposed as a method for improving the visualization and identification of extrahepatic biliary anatomy in order to possibly reduce injuries and related complications. The most common method of indocyanine green (ICG) administration is the intravenous route, whereas evidence on direct ICG injection into the gallbladder is still quite limited. We aimed to compare the two different methods of ICG administration in terms of the visualization of extrahepatic biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), analyzing differences in the time of visualization, as well as the efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of both modalities. (2) Methods: A total of 35 consecutive adult patients affected by acute or chronic gallbladder disease were enrolled in this prospective case−control study. Seventeen patients underwent LC with direct gallbladder ICG injection (IC-ICG) and eighteen subjects received intravenous ICG administration (IV-ICG). (3) Results: The groups were comparable with regard to their demographic and perioperative characteristics. The IV-ICG group had a significantly shorter overall operative time compared to the IC-ICG group (p = 0.017). IV-ICG was better at delineating the duodenum and the common hepatic duct compared to the IC-ICG method (p = 0.009 and p = 0.041, respectively). The cystic duct could be delineated pre-dissection in 76.5% and 66.7% of cases in the IC-ICG and IV-ICG group, respectively, and this increased to 88.2% and 83.3% after dissection. The common bile duct could be highlighted in 76.5% and 77.8% of cases in the IC-ICG and IV-ICG group, respectively. Liver fluorescence was present in one case in the IC-ICG group and in all cases after IV-ICG administration (5.8% versus 100%; p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusions: The present study demonstrates how ICG-fluorescence cholangiography can be helpful in identifying the extrahepatic biliary anatomy during dissection of Calot’s triangle in both administration methods. In comparison with intravenous ICG injection, the intracholecystic ICG route could provide a better signal-to-background ratio by avoiding hepatic fluorescence, thus increasing the bile duct-to-liver contrast.

Indexed as

ICGindocyanine greenintraoperative cholangiographylaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID35743577
PMCPMC9224771
OpenAlexW4283074619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.