Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35743499›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

A Practical Guide for Intra-Renal Temperature and Pressure Management during Rirs: What Is the Evidence Telling Us.

Felipe Pauchard, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Mariela Corrales, Olivier Traxer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07306819 (Flexible Ureteroscopy Using a Tip-Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Stones), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07306819 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Flexible Ureteroscopy Using a Tip-Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsStone, Renal, Stone, Urinary, Stone, KidneyArmsmini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Flexible Uerteroscopy with Tip-Bendable Suction Sheath
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felipe PauchardUrology Department, Hospital Naval Almirante Nef, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-0042
Eugenio VentimigliaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Mariela CorralesGroupe de Recherche Cliniques sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, F-75020 Paris, France.
Olivier TraxerGroupe de Recherche Cliniques sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, F-75020 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne of the main limitations of Ho:YAG lithotripsy is represented by its advancement speed. The need for faster lithotripsy has led to the introduction of high-power laser equipment. This general trend in increasing Ho:YAG lithotripsy power has certain points that deserve to be considered and analyzed. The objective is to carry out a narrative review on intrarenal temperature and pressure during ureteroscopy.

methodsA literature search using PUBMED database from inception to December 2021 was performed. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis.

resultsUsing more power in the laser correlates with an increase in temperature that can be harmful to the kidney. This potential risk can be overcome by increasing either the irrigation inflow or outflow. Increasing irrigant flow can lead to high intrarenal temperature (IRP). The factors that allow the reduction of intrarenal pressure are a low irrigation flow, the use of a ureteral access sheath of adequate diameter according to the equipment used, and the occupation of the working channel by the laser or basket.

conclusionTo maintain a safe temperature profile, it has been proposed to use chilled irrigation fluid, intermittent laser activation or to increase irrigation flow. This last recommendation can lead to increased IRP, which can be overcome by using a UAS. Another option is to use low power laser configurations in order to avoid temperature increases and not require high irrigation flows.

Indexed as

intrarenal pressureintrarenal temperatureureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35743499
PMCPMC9224584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.