Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35743414›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Marking the Profile of the Microflora of the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix in Women as a Potential Factor Determining the Effectiveness of In Vitro Fertilization.

Anna Bednarska-Czerwińska, Michał Czerwiński, Emilia Morawiec, Aleksandra Łach, Anna Ziaja, Adrian Kusaj, Patrycja Strączyńska, Dorota Sagan, Dariusz Boroń, Beniamin Oskar Grabarek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Endometrial Microbiota and Immune Tolerance in Pregnancy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Bednarska-CzerwińskaGyncentrum Fertility Clinic, 40-121 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9871-7082
Michał CzerwińskiGyncentrum Fertility Clinic, 40-121 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-3182
Emilia MorawiecGyncentrum Fertility Clinic, 40-121 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8360-359X
Aleksandra ŁachDepartment of Histology, Cytophysiology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology, Academy of Silesia in Katowice, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Anna ZiajaDepartment of Histology, Cytophysiology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology, Academy of Silesia in Katowice, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Adrian KusajDepartment of Histology, Cytophysiology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology, Academy of Silesia in Katowice, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Patrycja StrączyńskaGyncentrum Fertility Clinic, 40-121 Katowice, Poland.
Dorota SaganMedical Center Dormed Medical SPA, 28-105 Busko-Zdroj, Poland.
Dariusz BorońDepartment of Histology, Cytophysiology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology, Academy of Silesia in Katowice, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2691-5829
Beniamin Oskar GrabarekGyncentrum Fertility Clinic, 40-121 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-7145
Euro-Centrum · PLUniversity of Silesia in Katowice · PLMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One promising research trend involves evaluating the influence of microbiota in the reproductive system of women on becoming pregnant and maintaining pregnancy. The goal of this study was to define the microflora profile of the endometrium and uterine cervix in women qualified for an in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure, which is expected to contribute to increasing the percentage of successful IVF implantations. Based on the conducted molecular analysis in the collected swabs, 22 bacterial strains were identified. Eleven strains (57%) that were isolated belong to the physiological microflora, the most common strain of which was Lactobacillus. Eight of the isolated strains (33%) were pathological microflora, among which the most common bacteria were from the Enterobacteriaceae family (which includes E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella). Finally, three of the bacterial strains (10%) may be a component of both physiological or pathological microflora of the vagina: Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum group, and Alloscardovia omnicolens. The presence of Escherichia coli was detected in six women, Staphylococcus aureus also in six patients, Atopobium parvulum in three, Streptococcus salivarius group in three, Enterococcus faecalis in four, and Aerococcus christensenii in two patients. We found statistically significant relationships (p < 0.05) between Lactobacillus fermentum and Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Escherichia coli groups, Lactobacillus FN667084_s and Staphylococcus aureus groups, as well as Lactobacillus fermentum and Streptococcus agalactiae. Based on the conducted study, it may be confirmed that the endometrium is, to a large extent, colonized by lactic acid bacilli. Apart from that, endometrial dysbiosis was not noted in patients qualified for the IVF procedure.

Indexed as

endometriumin vitro fertilizationmicrobiomemicrobiotanext-generation sequencinguterine cervix

Identifiers

PMID35743414
PMCPMC9224746
OpenAlexW4281704551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.