ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Polypeptides Isolated from
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between loneliness trajectories and chronic diseases as well as chronic comorbidities among middle - aged and elderly chinese: based on the group - based trajectory modeling method.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Microbial proteases as emerging anti-inflammatory therapeutics: a comprehensive review.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of water kefir microbiota and its bioactive metabolites for health promoting bio-functional products and applications.AIMS microbiology · 2024Review
- Comparison of the in vitro Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Cannabidiol to Dexamethasone.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of Lactococcus lactis BL52 and isolate active substances responsible for anti-inflammatory activity. Head-kidney (HK) macrophages were used for in vitro bioassay-guided isolation, and the structure of the two peptides was identified by mass spectrometry analysis. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory responses in Ctenopharyngodon idella were also examined to evaluate the in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of active substances. Two active peptides were isolated by HPLC from L. lactis BL52, and an in vitro anti-inflammatory assay demonstrated that peptide ALBL1 and ALBL2 dose-dependently inhibited LPS-induced inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β and inflammatory factors NO and PGE 2 production in macrophages (p < 0.05). After being treated with 20 mg/Kg peptide ALBL1 and ALBL2, the expression levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, NO, and PGE 2 were significantly inhibited (p < 0.05). Results from the in vivo test showed that when the concentration of peptide ALBL1 and ALBL2 reached 30 mg/Kg, the LPS-induced upregulations of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, NO, and PGE 2 were prevented. In addition, peptide ALBL1 and ALBL2 blocked the expression of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and then suppressed the phosphorylation of nuclear transcription factor-kappa B (NF-κB) p65 and degradation inhibitor of IκBα. Moreover, C. idella treated with peptide ALBL1 and ALBL2 can relieve pathological inflammatory responses caused by LPS. These results suggest that the anti-inflammatory properties of peptide ALBL1 and ALBL2 might be a result from the inhibition of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α expressions through the downregulation of Toll2/NF-κB signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.