ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
A Guide to Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogel Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting Applications.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversification of biofilm architecture among freshwaterApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Aerosol Jet Printing in Biotechnologies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biopolymer-Based Hydrogels for Wound Healing: Advances in Cellulose, Chitosan, Alginate, and Hyaluronic Acid from Design to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Control of immunogenic responses of microorganism-synthesized biopolymers for 3D bioprinting tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Engineering the Healing Process: Advanced In Vitro Wound Models and Technologies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- 3D Bioprinted Natural Hydrogels: Rheological Characterization, Cytotoxicity, and Printability Assessment of a Polysaccharide-Based Bioink.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Double-Network Polysaccharide-Collagen Hybrid Bioink.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Modified Polysaccharides: Potential Biomaterials for Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Bioprinting Vascularized Constructs for Clinical Relevance: Engineering Hydrogel Systems for Biological Maturity.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrices for Skin Wound Treatment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biofabrication of HepG2 Cells-Laden 3D Structures Using Nanocellulose-Reinforced Gelatin-Based Hydrogel Bioinks: Materials Characterization, Cell Viability Assessment, and Metabolomic Analysis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- All-Cellulose Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for the Versatile 3D Bioprinting of Different Cell Lines.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Bioprinted Hydrogels as Vehicles for the Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Regenerative Medicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Natural Regenerative Hydrogels for Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Silk Fibroin-Enriched Bioink Promotes Cell Proliferation in 3D-Bioprinted Constructs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Valorization of Grain and Oil By-Products with Special Focus on Hemicellulose Modification.Polymers · 2024Review
- Biofabrication's Contribution to the Evolution of Cultured Meat.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Unlocking the Potential of Stem Cell Microenvironments In Vitro.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Glycosaminoglycans' Ability to Promote Wound Healing: From Native Living Macromolecules to Artificial Biomaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Reasoning on Pore Terminology in 3D Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an innovative technology in the biomedical field, allowing the fabrication of living constructs through an approach of layer-by-layer deposition of cell-laden inks, the so-called bioinks. An ideal bioink should possess proper mechanical, rheological, chemical, and biological characteristics to ensure high cell viability and the production of tissue constructs with dimensional stability and shape fidelity. Among the several types of bioinks, hydrogels are extremely appealing as they have many similarities with the extracellular matrix, providing a highly hydrated environment for cell proliferation and tunability in terms of mechanical and rheological properties. Hydrogels derived from natural polymers, and polysaccharides, in particular, are an excellent platform to mimic the extracellular matrix, given their low cytotoxicity, high hydrophilicity, and diversity of structures. In fact, polysaccharide-based hydrogels are trendy materials for 3D bioprinting since they are abundant and combine adequate physicochemical and biomimetic features for the development of novel bioinks. Thus, this review portrays the most relevant advances in polysaccharide-based hydrogel bioinks for 3D bioprinting, focusing on the last five years, with emphasis on their properties, advantages, and limitations, considering polysaccharide families classified according to their source, namely from seaweed, higher plants, microbial, and animal (particularly crustaceans) origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.