Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742993›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Targeting Cell Cycle Progression in HER2+ Breast Cancer: An Emerging Treatment Opportunity.

Nischal Koirala, Nandini Dey, Jennifer Aske, Pradip De

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Role of CD4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nischal KoiralaTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD 57105, USA.
Nandini DeyTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD 57105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5533-8784
Jennifer AskeTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD 57105, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9405-5464
Pradip DeTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD 57105, USA.
Avera Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of HER2-targeted therapies has dramatically improved patient survival and patient management and increased the quality of life in the HER2+ breast cancer patient population. Due to the activation of compensatory pathways, patients eventually suffer from resistance to HER2-directed therapies and develop a more aggressive disease phenotype. One of these mechanisms is the crosstalk between ER and HER2 signaling, especially the CDK4/6-Cyclin D-Rb signaling axis that is commonly active and has received attention for its potential role in regulating tumor progression. CDK 4/6 inhibitors interfere with the binding of cell-cycle-dependent kinases (CDKs) with their cognate partner cyclins, and forestall the progression of the cell cycle by preventing Rb phosphorylation and E2F release that consequentially leads to cancer cell senescence. CDK 4/6 inhibitors, namely, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, in combination with anti-estrogen therapies, have shown impressive outcomes in hormonal receptor-positive (HR+) disease and have received approval for this disease context. As an extension of this concept, preclinical/clinical studies incorporating CDK 4/6 inhibitors with HER2-targeted drugs have been evaluated and have shown potency in limiting tumor progression, restoring therapeutic sensitivity, and may improving the management of the disease. Currently, several clinical trials are examining the synergistic effects of CDK 4/6 inhibitors with optimized HER2-directed therapies for the (ER+/-) HER2+ population in the metastatic setting. In this review, we aim to interrogate the burden of HER2+ disease in light of recent treatment progress in the field and examine the clinical benefit of CDK 4/6 inhibitors as a replacement for traditional chemotherapy to improve outcomes in HER2+ breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAminopyridinesCell CycleCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6FemaleHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuality of LifeAminopyridinesCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase Inhibitorsbrain metastasiscell cycle inhibitorscell cycle pathwayERBB2HER2+ breast cancerHER2-targeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID35742993
PMCPMC9224522
OpenAlexW4282592293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.