Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742823›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

The Development of FAK Inhibitors: A Five-Year Update.

Andrea Spallarossa, Bruno Tasso, Eleonora Russo, Carla Villa, Chiara Brullo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea SpallarossaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 3, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3360-7146
Bruno TassoDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 3, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5636-5645
Eleonora RussoDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 3, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Carla VillaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 3, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-3515
Chiara BrulloDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 3, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2575-7726
University of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase over-expressed in different solid cancers. In recent years, FAK has been recognized as a new target for the development of antitumor agents, useful to contrast tumor development and metastasis formation. To date, studies on the role of FAK and FAK inhibitors are of great interest for both pharmaceutical companies and academia. This review is focused on compounds able to block FAK with different potencies and with different mechanisms of action, that have appeared in the literature since 2017. Furthermore, new emerging PROTAC molecules have appeared in the literature. This summary could improve knowledge of new FAK inhibitors and provide information for future investigations, in particular, from a medicinal chemistry point of view.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsFocal Adhesion Kinase 1Focal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsFocal Adhesion Kinase 1Focal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase Inhibitorsanticancer compoundsFAK inhibitorsfocal adhesion kinasemedicinal chemistryPROTACpyrimidinestriazines

Identifiers

PMID35742823
PMCPMC9223874
OpenAlexW4281722307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.