Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742757›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Bioleaching of Typical Electronic Waste-Printed Circuit Boards (WPCBs): A Short Review.

Xiaosheng Ji, Mindong Yang, Anping Wan, Shaoqi Yu, Zhitong Yao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Possibilities of Managing Waste Iron Sorbent FFH after COMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. RSC advances · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaosheng JiCryogenic Center, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China.
Mindong YangChina Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China.
Anping WanCryogenic Center, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China.
Shaoqi YuCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhitong YaoCollege of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9180-2329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid pace of innovations and the frequency of replacement of electrical and electronic equipment has made waste printed circuit boards (WPCB) one of the fastest growing waste streams. The frequency of replacement of equipment can be caused by a limited time of proper functioning and increasing malfunctions. Resource utilization of WPCBs have become some of the most profitable companies in the recycling industry. To facilitate WPCB recycling, several advanced technologies such as pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy and biometallurgy have been developed. Bioleaching uses naturally occurring microorganisms and their metabolic products to recover valuable metals, which is a promising technology due to its cost-effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and sustainability. However, there is sparse comprehensive research on WPCB bioleaching. Therefore, in this work, a short review was conducted from the perspective of potential microorganisms, bioleaching mechanisms and parameter optimization. Perspectives on future research directions are also discussed.

Indexed as

Electronic WasteElectronicsMetalsRecyclingMetalsbioleaching mechanismbiometallurgyelectronic wastesulfur-oxidizing bacteriawaste printed circuit boards

Identifiers

PMID35742757
PMCPMC9224389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.