Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742732›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Returning Home after Decontamination? Applying the Protective Action Decision Model to a Nuclear Accident Scenario.

Joel Rasmussen, Petter B Wikström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Citizens' Communication Needs and Attitudes to Risk in a Nuclear Accident Scenario: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel RasmussenCrisis Communication Centre, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6407-6037
Petter B WikströmDepartment of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency Dnr 2017-7043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the aftermath of nuclear power plant accidents show that affected citizens assess higher risks and adopt more risk-avoidant behaviors than authorities expect. This results in differences between the planned recovery and actual outcomes. Based on this knowledge, this study examined the factors that affect citizens' preference to continue living in a decontaminated area. Testing the key aspects of the protective action decision model (PADM), this study analyzed Swedish survey data (

Indexed as

Fukushima Nuclear AccidentRadioactive Hazard ReleaseDecontaminationHumansJapanNuclear Power Plantsdecontaminationlocal populationsnuclear accidentsPADMreturn migrationrisk perceptions

Identifiers

PMID35742732
PMCPMC9223827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.