Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742692›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Understanding Impacts of SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program at Farmers' Markets: Findings from a 13 State RCT.

Allison Karpyn, Julia Pon, Sara B Grajeda, Rui Wang, Kathryn E Merritt, Tara Tracy, Henry May, Ginnie Sawyer-Morris, McKenna M Halverson, Alan Hunt

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Allison KarpynCenter for Research in Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9043-5101
Julia PonTarget, Mountain View, CA 94040, USA.
Sara B GrajedaPodium, Orem, UT 84097, USA.
Rui WangMathematica, Washington, DC 20002, USA.
Kathryn E MerrittRobert Half, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA.
Tara TracyCenter for Research in Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9374-584X
Henry MayCenter for Research in Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
Ginnie Sawyer-MorrisCenter for Research in Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7821-6440
McKenna M HalversonCenter for Research in Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-3782
Alan HuntMusconetcong Watershed Association, Asbury, NJ 08802, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2087-4445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparities in healthy food access and consumption are a major public health concern. This study reports the findings from a two-year randomized control trial conducted at 77 farmers' markets (FMs) in 13 states and the District of Columbia that sought to understand the impact of fruit and vegetable (FV) incentive vouchers, randomly issued at varied incentive levels to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients, for use at FMs. Measures included FV and overall household food purchasing; FV consumption; food insecurity; health status; market expenditure; and demographics. A repeated-measures mixed-effects analysis and the Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) were used to examine outcomes. Despite 82% reporting food insecurity in the prior year, the findings showed that financial incentives at FMs had statistically significant, positive effects on FV consumption; market expenditures increased with added incentives. SNAP recipients receiving an incentive of USD 0.40 for every USD 1.00 in SNAP spent an average of USD 19.03 per transaction, while those receiving USD 2 for every USD 1 (2:1) spent an average of USD 36.28 per transaction. The data showed that the incentive program at the highest level (2:1) maximally increased SNAP FM expenditure and FV consumption, increasing the latter by 0.31 daily cups among those who used their incentive (CACE model).

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFarmersFood SupplyFruitHumansMotivationVegetablesfarmers’ marketsfood securityfruits and vegetablesincentive programslow-incomeSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)

Identifiers

PMID35742692
PMCPMC9223796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.