Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742675›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Physicians' Perspectives on the Implementation of the Second Opinion Directive in Germany-An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

Susann May, Dunja Bruch, Felix Muehlensiepen, Yuriy Ignatyev, Edmund Neugebauer, Cecile Ronckers, Sebastian von Peter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susann MayCenter for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 15562 Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-4861
Dunja BruchCenter for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 15562 Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9511-8487
Felix MuehlensiepenCenter for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 15562 Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8571-7286
Yuriy IgnatyevCenter for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 15562 Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Edmund NeugebauerCenter for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 15562 Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Cecile RonckersBrandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-4657
Sebastian von PeterBrandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new Second Opinion Directive (SOD) was introduced in Germany in December 2018 for hysterectomy, tonsillotomy, and tonsillectomy to support shared decision making and to avoid unnecessary surgeries. Owing to its recent implementation, evidence and insights regarding outcomes and challenges encountered with the SOD are lacking, notably from the physicians' perspective. To assess this, we undertook an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design with an initial qualitative phase followed by a quantitative evaluation. A qualitative analysis of 22 interviews with specialists in gynecology and otorhinolaryngology was followed by a statistical analysis of a survey of 136 physicians in those disciplines. The specialists expressed a generally positive opinion of the new SOD, emphasizing the aspects of patient orientation, support in decision making, and patient safety. However, they also highlighted the following structural problems regarding the SOD implementation: In addition to an increased organisational effort, the specialists criticised the SOD with regard to its implementation in rural regions with a low availability of specialists for referral. Barriers that impede the implementation of the current directive, such as the adaptation of the qualifying requirements for authorized second opinion physicians, as well as the inclusion of relevant indications, need focused consideration to obtain better alignment with everyday practice.

Indexed as

PhysiciansDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedFemaleGermanyHumansReferral and ConsultationSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutasehealth systeminformed decision makingmixed-methodspatient safetysecond opinionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35742675
PMCPMC9224158
OpenAlexW4283012914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.