Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742616›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Analysis of Factors Influencing Miners' Unsafe Behaviors in Intelligent Mines using a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model.

Xinping Wang, Cheng Zhang, Jun Deng, Chang Su, Zhenzhe Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of Risk Factors of Coal Chemical Enterprises Based on Text Mining.Journal of environmental and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrated Approach for Safety Culture Factor Evaluation from a Sustainability Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinping WangSchool of Management, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.
Cheng ZhangSchool of Management, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.
Jun DengSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.
Chang SuSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.
Zhenzhe GaoSchool of Management, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coal mine accidents seriously affect people's safety and social development, and intelligent mines have improved the production safety environment. However, safety management and miners' work in intelligent mines face new changes and higher requirements, and the safety situation remains challenging. Therefore, exploring the key influencing factors of miners' unsafe behaviors in intelligent mines is important. Our work focuses on (1) investigating the relationship and hierarchy of 20 factors, (2) using fuzzy theory to improve the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method and introducing the maximum mean de-entropy (MMDE) method to determine the unique threshold scientifically, and (3) developing a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to provide theoretical basis and methods for managers. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the influence degree of government regulation, leadership attention, safety input level, safety system standardization, and dynamic supervision intensity exert the most significant influence on the others; (2) the causality of government regulation, which is the deep factor, is the highest, and self-efficacy displays the smallest causality, and it is the most sensitive compared to various other factors; (3) knowledge accumulation ability, man-machine compatibility, emergency management capability, and organizational safety culture has the highest centrality among the individual factors, device factors, management factors, and environmental factors, respectively. Thus, corresponding management measures are proposed to improve coal mine safety and miners' occupational health.

Indexed as

Coal MiningMinersOccupational HealthCoalHumansSafety ManagementCoalDEMATELintelligent mineMCDMminers’ unsafe behaviorsMMDE

Identifiers

PMID35742616
PMCPMC9224353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.