ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Analysis of Factors Influencing Miners' Unsafe Behaviors in Intelligent Mines using a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Influence of Socio-Demographic and Personal Traits (Knowledge, Attitude) on Practices Among Silica-Dust Exposed Mineworkers in the SADC Region.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Convolutional Block Attention Module-Multimodal Feature-Fusion Action Recognition: Enabling Miner Unsafe Action Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A chemical accident cause text mining method based on improved accident triangle.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Game analysis of enterprise safety investment and employee safety behavior strategy evolution in high-risk industries.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Investigation of the Suppression of Methane Explosions by NACS omega · 2023Article
- Analysis of Risk Factors of Coal Chemical Enterprises Based on Text Mining.Journal of environmental and public health · 2023Article
- Human reliability assessment of intelligent coal mine hoist system based on Bayesian network.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- An Investigation of Employees' Intention to Comply with Information Security System-A Mixed Approach Based on Regression Analysis and fsQCA.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Integrated Approach for Safety Culture Factor Evaluation from a Sustainability Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Double-Edged Sword of Safety Training for Safety Behavior: The Critical Role of Psychological Factors during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Research on the formation mechanism of information cocoon and individual differences among researchers based on information ecology theory.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coal mine accidents seriously affect people's safety and social development, and intelligent mines have improved the production safety environment. However, safety management and miners' work in intelligent mines face new changes and higher requirements, and the safety situation remains challenging. Therefore, exploring the key influencing factors of miners' unsafe behaviors in intelligent mines is important. Our work focuses on (1) investigating the relationship and hierarchy of 20 factors, (2) using fuzzy theory to improve the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method and introducing the maximum mean de-entropy (MMDE) method to determine the unique threshold scientifically, and (3) developing a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to provide theoretical basis and methods for managers. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the influence degree of government regulation, leadership attention, safety input level, safety system standardization, and dynamic supervision intensity exert the most significant influence on the others; (2) the causality of government regulation, which is the deep factor, is the highest, and self-efficacy displays the smallest causality, and it is the most sensitive compared to various other factors; (3) knowledge accumulation ability, man-machine compatibility, emergency management capability, and organizational safety culture has the highest centrality among the individual factors, device factors, management factors, and environmental factors, respectively. Thus, corresponding management measures are proposed to improve coal mine safety and miners' occupational health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.