Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742483›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Role of Personalization in the User Experience, Preferences and Engagement with Virtual Reality Environments for Relaxation.

Susanna Pardini, Silvia Gabrielli, Marco Dianti, Caterina Novara, Gesualdo M Zucco, Ornella Mich, Stefano Forti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TheContemporary clinical trials communications · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susanna PardiniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-8923
Silvia GabrielliDigital Health Lab, Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7080-0615
Marco DiantiDigital Health Lab, Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy.
Caterina NovaraDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-2932
Gesualdo M ZuccoDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Palazzo del Capitanio, Piazza Capitaniato 3, 35139 Padova, Italy.
Ornella MichCenter for Information and Communication Technology, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9063-2540
Stefano FortiDigital Health Lab, Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual Reality Environments (VREs) are widely deployed in mental health treatments, often associated with relaxation techniques. The personalization of natural VR-based scenarios is a key element that can further facilitate users' sense of presence and relaxation. This study explored the role of VREs' personalization in the user experience with an environment supporting relaxation, by deploying mixed methods.

methodsA non-clinical sample of 20 individuals participated in exposure to a supportive body-scan-guided relaxation VRE. In the personalized conditions, the participants had the option of choosing the context (e.g., sea, mountain, or countryside) and including in the scenario different types of sounds, visual elements, and changing the time of day and weather. In the standard conditions, individuals were exposed to a relaxing VRE, but they could choose neither the context nor the auditory and visual elements. The order of presentation of the personalized vs non-personalized environments was randomized. Measures regarding relaxation, state-anxiety perceived levels, VRE-related symptoms, the usability of the Virtual Reality (VR) setting, sense of presence, pleasure, activation, engagement, and level of immersion experienced were collected before and after exposure to the VR environments.

resultsFindings showed that personalized VREs were preferred by users. Participants generally preferred to experience a greater immersivity, pleasure, engagement, and relaxation in the personalized virtual settings.

conclusionThe study further confirms the role of personalization as a component positively contributing to relaxation and engagement. Future research may further assess this effect in the context of large-scale controlled studies involving clinical and non-clinical populations.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansRelaxationRelaxation Therapymental well-beingmixed-method studynon-clinical populationpersonalized virtual environmentuser-experiencevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35742483
PMCPMC9223778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.