Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742433›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Testing Seefeldt's Proficiency Barrier: A Longitudinal Study.

Fernando Garbeloto Dos Santos, Matheus Maia Pacheco, David Stodden, Go Tani, José António Ribeiro Maia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A New Developmental Approach for Judo Focusing on Health, Physical, Motor, and Educational Attributes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando Garbeloto Dos SantosCIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.
Matheus Maia PachecoCIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9822-981X
David StoddenDepartment of Physical Education & Athletic Training, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Go TaniSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, Av. Professor Mello Moraes, 65, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6517-5472
José António Ribeiro MaiaCIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3273-0046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea that proficiency in the fundamental movement skills (FMS) is necessary for the development of more complex motor skills (i.e., the proficiency barrier) and to promote health-enhancing physical activity and health-related physical fitness levels is widespread in the literature of motor development. Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study assessing whether children presenting proficiency below a specified proficiency barrier would demonstrate difficulty in improving performance in more complex skills-even when subjected to a period of practice in these complex skills. The present study tested this. Eighty-five normal children (44 boys) aged 7 to 10 years participated in the study. The intervention took place during 10 consecutive classes, once a week, lasting 40 min each. Six FMS (running, hopping, leaping, kicking, catching and stationary dribbling) and one transitional motor skill (TMS) (speed dribbling skill) were assessed. The results showed that only those who showed sufficient proficiency in running and stationary dribbling before the intervention were able to show high performance values in the TMS after intervention. In addition, in line with recent propositions, the results show that the basis for development of the TMS was specific critical components of the FMS and that the barrier can be captured through a logistic function. These results corroborate the proficiency barrier hypothesis and highlight that mastering the critical components of the FMS is a necessary condition for motor development.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMotor SkillsChildHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMovementPhysical Fitnessfundamental movement skillsintervention programmotor developmentspecific sport skillstransitional motor skills

Identifiers

PMID35742433
PMCPMC9222670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.