Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742409›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Rethinking Lockdown Policies in the Pre-Vaccine Era of COVID-19: A Configurational Perspective.

Ziang Zhang, Chao Liu, Robin Nunkoo, Vivek A Sunnassee, Xiaoyan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ziang ZhangSchool of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Chao LiuFaculty of Hospitality & Tourism Management, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau 999078, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5960-849X
Robin NunkooDepartment of Management, University of Mauritius, Reduit MU 80837, Mauritius.ORCID 0000-0002-3583-9717
Vivek A SunnasseeWestminster Business School, University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5LS, UK.
Xiaoyan ChenSchool of Humanities, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of lockdown policies for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic is widely recognized. However, most studies have focused on individual lockdown measures. The effectiveness of lockdown policy combinations has not been examined from a configurational perspective. This research applies fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine different lockdown policy combinations associated with high-epidemic situations in 84 countries. A high-epidemic situation can occur through three different "weak-confined" patterns of lockdown policy combinations. The findings demonstrate that a combination of lockdown policies is more successful than any single lockdown policy, whereas the absence of several key measures in policy combinations can lead to a high-epidemic situation. The importance of international travel controls can become obscured when they are the only measures adopted, and a high-epidemic situation can still arise where restrictions are placed on international travel but not on public transport or when workplaces are closed but schools remain open.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPolicySARS-CoV-2Vaccinescomparative policy analysisCOVID-19fsQCAhigh epidemiclockdown policypandemic

Identifiers

PMID35742409
PMCPMC9223109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.