Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742316›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Analysis and Visualization of Research on Resilient Cities and Communities Based on VOSviewer.

Yu-Jie Huang, Shuo Cheng, Fu-Qiang Yang, Chao Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu-Jie HuangCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-8245
Shuo ChengCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China.
Fu-Qiang YangCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China.
Chao ChenSafety and Security Science Group, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-8017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To objectively grasp the current situation and development trend of resilient cities or communities (RC) research. The articles in Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection databases from 1995 to 2022 were used as a sample, and bibliometrics was used to statistically analyze the year of publication and number of articles, highly cited documents and keyword hotness in this field. VOSviewer was used to explore the knowledge graph of RC research documents. The results show that: the development process is roughly divided into 3 periods: no attention (1995-2004), starting (2005-2014), and rapid growth (2015-2021). The journal "

Indexed as

BibliometricsData ManagementCitiesColoradoDatabases, FactualPublicationsbibliometricsknowledge graphresilient citiesresilient communitiesVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID35742316
PMCPMC9223032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.