Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742261›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Speech Impaired by Half Masks Used for the Respiratory Tract Protection.

Krzysztof Nowacki, Karolina Łakomy, Wojciech Marczak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krzysztof NowackiDepartment of Production Engineering, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2A Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2925-084X
Karolina ŁakomyDepartment of Production Engineering, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2A Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Wojciech MarczakFaculty of Science and Technology, Jan Długosz University, Al. Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7323-8293
Silesian University of Technology · PLJan Długosz University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filtering half masks belong to the group of personal protective equipment in the work environment. They protect the respiratory tract but may hinder breath and suppress speech. The present work is focused on the attenuation of sound by the half masks known as "filtering facepieces", FFPs, of various construction and filtration efficiency. Rather than study the perception of speech by humans, we used a generator of white noise and artificial speech to obtain objective characteristics of the attenuation. The generator speaker was either covered by an FFP or remained uncovered while a class 1 meter measured sound pressure levels in 1/3 octave bands with center frequencies 100-20 kHz at distances from 1 to 5 m from the speaker. All five FFPs suppressed acoustic waves from the octave bands with center frequencies of 1 kHz and higher, i.e., in the frequency range responsible for 80% of the perceived speech intelligibility, particularly in the 2 kHz-octave band. FFPs of higher filtration efficiency stronger attenuated the sound. Moreover, the FFPs changed the voice timbre because the attenuation depended on the wave frequency. The two combined factors can impede speech intelligibility.

Indexed as

MasksSpeech PerceptionHumansRespiratory SystemSoundSpeech Intelligibilityfiltering half masksprotective measuresspeech intelligibilitysuppressionvoice

Identifiers

PMID35742261
PMCPMC9222881
OpenAlexW4282028506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.