Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742197›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia in Patients with Special Needs Provided by Private and Public Healthcare Services-A Retrospective, Comparative Study.

Marcello Alves Marinho, Flávia Cristina Teixeira Ramos, Andréa Lanzillotti Cardoso, Geraldo Oliveira Silva-Junior, Marcelo Daniel Brito Faria, Luciana Freitas Bastos, Arkadiusz Dziedzic, Bruna Lavinas Sayed Picciani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dental Treatment in Children under General Anesthesia: A 24-year Retrospective Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcello Alves MarinhoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Friburgo 20950-000, RJ, Brazil.
Flávia Cristina Teixeira RamosCenter of Dental Radiology and Care to Patients with Special Needs, Piquet Carneiro Polyclinic, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janiero 20950-000, RJ, Brazil.
Andréa Lanzillotti CardosoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Friburgo 20950-000, RJ, Brazil.
Geraldo Oliveira Silva-JuniorGraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Friburgo 20950-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0987-2684
Marcelo Daniel Brito FariaCenter of Dental Radiology and Care to Patients with Special Needs, Piquet Carneiro Polyclinic, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janiero 20950-000, RJ, Brazil.
Luciana Freitas BastosCenter of Dental Radiology and Care to Patients with Special Needs, Piquet Carneiro Polyclinic, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janiero 20950-000, RJ, Brazil.
Arkadiusz DziedzicDepartment of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics, Medical University of Silesia, 40-551 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0022-8382
Bruna Lavinas Sayed PiccianiGraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Friburgo 20950-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7592-1785
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In special care dentistry, general anesthesia (GA) is considered as an alternative option to facilitate treatment for uncooperative patients with special needs (PSN) who require invasive dental interventions.

objectiveto evaluate the profile of dental treatment procedures performed and the characteristics of PSN who underwent dental treatment under GA, provided by private and public healthcare providers.

methodsA retrospective, observational study involving a sample of 100 PSN treated in hospital and specialist secondary care settings. Demographic data and clinical information were collected. The analysis of data was performed using descriptive analysis and frequency statistical tests.

resultsout of 100 participants, 63% of the PSN who received care in the private sector and the remaining 37% of PSN registered with public-funded care providers, aged 6 to 80 years old, were treated under GA. Autistic spectrum disorder was the most common medical diagnosis recorded (33%). More than half (52%) of the PSN treated by private care providers sought specialist care in an outpatient setting prior to GA vs. 5% of the PSN treated by public-funded providers. The utilization of sedation prior to GA was more common in the private sector. A vast majority (86%) of all subjects underwent multiple dental extractions (86%) and restorations (62%).

conclusionscomprehensive dental care under GA, which composes an integral part of special care dentistry, can be safely provided in a hospital setting, in both private and public sectors. While early intervention using sedation and behavioral management partially mitigates the need for dental care under GA, the vast majority of PSN may require dental treatment under GA in future to facilitate complex dental care.

Indexed as

dental general anesthesiadisabled personsretrospective studyspecial needs

Identifiers

PMID35742197
PMCPMC9222989
OpenAlexW4283274840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.