Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742176›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Virtual Reality in the Rehabilitation of Patients with Injuries and Diseases of Upper Extremities.

Pinar Tokgöz, Susanne Stampa, Dirk Wähnert, Thomas Vordemvenne, Christoph Dockweiler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Preregistered test of whether a virtual nose reduces cybersickness.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pinar TokgözSchool of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4720-963X
Susanne StampaDepartment of Digital Health Sciences and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Siegen, 57068 Siegen, Germany.
Dirk WähnertDepartment for Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2352-7951
Thomas VordemvenneDepartment for Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany.
Christoph DockweilerDepartment of Digital Health Sciences and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Siegen, 57068 Siegen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-3279
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEUniversity of Siegen · DEBielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper-extremity injuries and diseases rarely have life-threatening consequences, but failure to manage them properly can result in severe dysfunction. This article presents the current state of using virtual reality to support the rehabilitation process of patients with injuries and diseases of the upper extremities and points out their effects on upper-extremity functions. A scoping review was conducted to provide a comprehensive overview of the field of virtual reality for upper-extremity rehabilitation. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched by two independent researchers between April and May 2021 to identify relevant publications and were examined according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. As a result of the literature review, 11 studies of various target groups were identified. Virtual-reality technologies were categorized into multisensory high-end systems and game-based systems. With respect to functional recovery, technologies based on virtual reality were not inferior to traditional rehabilitation. In addition, the users were highly motivated and satisfied. The results emphasize the need for stronger evidence-based virtual-reality technologies for rehabilitation of injuries and diseases of upper extremities.

Indexed as

rehabilitationupper extremityvirtual realityvirtual rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35742176
PMCPMC9222955
OpenAlexW4283011474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.