Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742158›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Osteoporosis Pre-Screening Using Ensemble Machine Learning in Postmenopausal Korean Women.

Youngihn Kwon, Juyeon Lee, Joo Hee Park, Yoo Mee Kim, Se Hwa Kim, Young Jun Won, Hyung-Yong Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Youngihn KwonInsilicogen, Inc., Yongin-si 16954, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1792-224X
Juyeon LeeAIDX, Inc., Yongin-si 16954, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-6161
Joo Hee ParkAIDX, Inc., Yongin-si 16954, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-0932
Yoo Mee KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon 22711, Korea.
Se Hwa KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon 22711, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2452-8419
Young Jun WonDepartment of Internal Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon 22711, Korea.
Hyung-Yong KimAIDX, Inc., Yongin-si 16954, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2799-7379
Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital · KRInsilicogen (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As osteoporosis is a degenerative disease related to postmenopausal aging, early diagnosis is vital. This study used data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys to predict a patient's risk of osteoporosis using machine learning algorithms. Data from 1431 postmenopausal women aged 40-69 years were used, including 20 features affecting osteoporosis, chosen by feature importance and recursive feature elimination. Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost, and Gradient Boosting (GBM) machine learning algorithms were each used to train three models: A, checkup features; B, survey features; and C, both checkup and survey features, respectively. Of the three models, Model C generated the best outcomes with an accuracy of 0.832 for RF, 0.849 for AdaBoost, and 0.829 for GBM. Its area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.919 for RF, 0.921 for AdaBoost, and 0.908 for GBM. By utilizing multiple feature selection methods, the ensemble models of this study achieved excellent results with an AUROC score of 0.921 with AdaBoost, which is 0.1-0.2 higher than those of the best performing models from recent studies. Our model can be further improved as a practical medical tool for the early diagnosis of osteoporosis after menopause.

Indexed as

feature selectionmachine learningosteoporosispostmenopausal womenpre-screeningrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID35742158
PMCPMC9222287
OpenAlexW4282921149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.