Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742152›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Treatment, Diagnostic Criteria and Variability of Terminology for Lateral Elbow Pain: Findings from an Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Luigi Di Filippo, Simone Vincenzi, Denis Pennella, Filippo Maselli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07495254 (Effectiveness of Combined Super Inductive System), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07495254 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Combined Super Inductive System (SIS) Therapy With Therapeutic Physical Therapy Exercise and Health Education in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Vic - Central University of CataloniaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled224ConditionsLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow), Lateral Epicondylalgia, Lateral Elbow TendinopathyArmsSuper Inductive System (SIS), therapeutic dose, Super Inductive System (SIS), non-therapeutic dose (active placebo), Therapeutic Exercise Program, Health Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luigi Di FilippoMedicine Department, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Simone VincenziMedicine Department, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Denis PennellaMedicine Department, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-6268
Filippo MaselliDepartment Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9683-9975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lateral elbow pain (LEP) represents a musculoskeletal disorder affecting the epicondyloid region of the elbow. The terminological framework of this problem in literature, to date, is confusing. This systematic review (SR) aims to analyse the panorama of the scientific literature concerning the pathogenetic framework, treatment, and clinical diagnosis of LEP. Methods: We conducted an SR according to the guidelines of the PRISMA statement. We performed research using the electronic Medline, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane Library databases. The research started on 12 January 2022 and finished on 30 April 2022. We included all systematic reviews and meta-analyses published, in English, between 1989 and 2022. The articles’ selection was based on critical appraisal using Amstar 2. In the selected reviews we obtained the etiopathogenic terminology used to describe the symptoms, treatment, and diagnostic criteria of LEP. Results: Twenty-five SRs met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. From these SRs, 227 RCT articles were analysed and different treatments proposals were extracted, such as exercise, manipulation corticosteroid injection, and surgery. In the selected articles, 10 different terms emerged to describe LEP and 12 different clinical tests. The most common treatments detected in this SR were a conservative multimodal approach (e.g., eccentric exercises, manual therapy, acupuncture, ultrasound), then surgery or other invasive treatments (e.g., corticosteroid injection, tenotomy). The most common term detected in this SR was “lateral epicondylitis” (n = 95, 51.6%), followed by “tennis elbow” (n = 51, 28.1%) and “lateral epicondylalgia” (n = 18, 9.4%). Among the diagnostic tests were painful palpation (n = 101, 46.8%), the Cozen test (n = 91, 42.1%), the pain-free grip-strength test (n = 41, 19.0%), and the Maudsley test (n = 48, 22.2%). A total of 43.1% of RCTs (n = 96) included subjects with LEP > 3 months, 40.2% (n = 85) included patients with LEP < 3 months, and 16.7% of the items (n = 35) were not specified by the inclusion criteria on the onset of symptoms. Conclusions: In this SR, a considerable terminological heterogeneity emerged in the description of LEP, associated with the lack of clear and recognised diagnostic criteria in evaluating and treating patients with lateral elbow pain.

Indexed as

diagnosislateral elbow tendinopathylateral epicondylitistennis elbowtreatment

Identifiers

PMID35742152
PMCPMC9222841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.