Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742139›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development of a General Health Score Based on 12 Objective Metabolic and Lifestyle Items: The Lifestyle and Well-Being Index.

Octavio Pano, Carmen Sayón-Orea, María Soledad Hershey, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Miguel A Martínez-González, J Alfredo Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Octavio PanoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4848-9944
Carmen Sayón-OreaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
María Soledad HersheyDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8690-8567
Maira Bes-RastrolloDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9139-4206
Miguel A Martínez-GonzálezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3917-9808
J Alfredo MartínezDepartment of Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-6941

Funding

Comunidad Foral de Navarra 122/2014Comunidad Foral de Navarra 27/2011Comunidad Foral de Navarra 45/2011European Regional Development Fund G03/140European Regional Development Fund PI10/00564European Regional Development Fund PI10/02293European Regional Development Fund PI10/02658European Regional Development Fund PI13/00615European Regional Development Fund PI14/01668European Regional Development Fund PI14/01764European Regional Development Fund PI14/01798European Regional Development Fund PI17/01795European Regional Development Fund RD 06/0045Instituto de Salud Carlos III G03/140Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI10/00564Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI10/02293Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI10/02658Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/00615Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI14/01668Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI14/01764Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI14/01798Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/01795Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD 06/0045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy and unhealthy lifestyles are tightly linked to general health and well-being. However, measurements of well-being have failed to include elements of health and easy to interpret information for patients seeking to improve lifestyles. Therefore, this study aimed to create an index for the assessment of general health and well-being along with two cut-off points: the lifestyle and well-being index (LWB-I). This was a cross-sectional analysis of 15,168 individuals. Internally valid multivariate linear models were constructed using key lifestyle features predicting a modified Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) and used to score the LWB-I. Categorization of the LWB-I was based on self-perceived health (SPH) and analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Optimal cut-points identified individuals with poor and excellent SPH. Lifestyle and well-being were adequately accounted for using 12 lifestyle items. SPH groups had increasingly healthier lifestyle features and LWB-I scores; optimal cut-point for poor SPH were scores below 80 points (AUC: 0.80 (0.79, 0.82); sensitivity 75.7%, specificity 72.3%)) and above 86 points for excellent SPH (AUC: 0.67 (0.66, 0.69); sensitivity 61.4%, specificity 63.3%). Lifestyle and well-being were quantitatively scored based on their associations with a general health measure in order to create the LWB-I along with two cut points.

Indexed as

health related quality of lifeIndexlifestylemetabolismprecision medicinewell-being

Identifiers

PMID35742139
PMCPMC9222586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.