Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742096›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Do General Practitioners in a Visiting Medical Officer Arrangement Improve the Perceived Quality of Care of Rural and Remote Patients? A Qualitative Study in Australia.

I Nyoman Sutarsa, Rosny Kasim, Ben Steward, Suzanne Bain-Donohue, Claudia Slimings, Sally Hall Dykgraaf, Amanda Barnard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

I Nyoman SutarsaRural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8261-2921
Rosny KasimRural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Ben StewardRural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7517-9215
Suzanne Bain-DonohueRural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6162-0479
Claudia SlimingsRural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Sally Hall DykgraafRural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8532-1086
Amanda BarnardRural Clinical School, Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.

Funding

Rural and Remote Health Service (RARMS) Ltd 2020/503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In rural and remote Australia, general practitioners (GPs) provide care across the continuum from primary to secondary care, often in Visiting Medical Officer (VMO) arrangements with a local hospital. However, little is known about the role of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of care and health outcomes for rural and remote communities. Methods: We collected qualitative data from three GP-VMOs (all aged >55 years) and 10 patients (all aged over 65 years) in three local health districts of New South Wales, Australia. Thirteen in-depth interviews were conducted between October 2020 and February 2021. We employed thematic analysis to identify key roles of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of care and health outcomes of rural and remote patients. Results: Our study advances the current understanding regarding the role of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of services and health outcomes of rural and remote patients. Key roles of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of care include promoting the continuity of care and integrated health services, cultivating trust from local communities, and enhancing the satisfaction of patients. Conclusions: GP-VMOs work across primary and secondary care creating better linkages and promoting the continuity of care for rural and remote communities. Employing GP-VMOs in rural hospitals enables the knowledge and sensitivity gained from their ongoing interactions with patients in primary care to be effectively utilised in the delivery of hospital care.

Indexed as

Australiahealth service deliveryprimary carequalitative studyquality of carerural health

Identifiers

PMID35742096
PMCPMC9223112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.