Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742032›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Cost Analysis for Patients with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Ralitsa Raycheva, Vanya Rangelova, Ani Kevorkyan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07240038 (Evaluation of an Evidence Based, Bundled Intervention to Reduce Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Neonatal Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07240038 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of an Evidence Based, Bundled Intervention to Reduce Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Neonatal Units (INBERNAV-Neo)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBiobizkaia Health Research InstituteRan2024 to 2026Enrolled1,500ConditionsPneumonia Ventilator Associated, Pneumonia Neonatal, Healthcare-associated InfectionsArmsMultimodal intervention to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia by training the health care team in specific and general evidence-based good clinical practices., Technique with a blind-protected catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ralitsa RaychevaDepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-6417-5681
Vanya RangelovaDepartment of Epidemiology and Disaster Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-5996
Ani KevorkyanDepartment of Epidemiology and Disaster Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-0459
Medical University Plovdiv · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of improving the quality and safety of healthcare is well known. However, a follow-up question is often asked about whether these improvements are cost-effective. The prevalence of nosocomial infections (NIs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is approximately 30% in developing countries. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the second most common NI in the NICU. Reducing the incidence of NIs can offer patients better and safer treatment and at the same time can provide cost savings for hospitals and payers. The aim of the study is to assess the direct costs of VAP in the NICU. This is a prospective study, conducted between January 2017 and June 2018 in the NICU of University Hospital “St. George” Plovdiv, Bulgaria. During this period, 107 neonates were ventilated for more than 48 h and included in the study. The costs for the hospital stay are based on the records from the Accounting Database of the setting. The differences directly attributable to VAP are presented both as an absolute value and percentage, based on the difference between the values of the analyzed variables. There are no statistically significant differences between patients with and without VAP in terms of age, sex, APGAR score, time of admission after birth and survival. We confirmed differences between the median birth weight (U = 924, p = 0.045) and average gestational age (t = 2.14, p = 0.035) of the patients in the two study groups. The median length of stay (patient-days) for patients with VAP is 32 days, compared to 18 days for non-VAP patients (U = 1752, p < 0.001). The attributive hospital stay due to VAP is 14 days. The median hospital costs for patients with VAP are estimated at €3675.77, compared to the lower expenses of €2327.78 for non-VAP patients (U = 1791.5, p < 0.001). The median cost for antibiotic therapy for patients with VAP is €432.79, compared to €351.61 for patients without VAP (U = 1556, p = 0.024). Our analysis confirms the results of other studies that the increased length of hospital stays due to VAP results in an increase in hospital costs. VAP is particularly associated with prematurity, low birth weight and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

antibioticsattributive costseconomic burdenhospital costsnosocomial infectionsventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID35742032
PMCPMC9223030
OpenAlexW4281481463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.