Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741951›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Impacts of COVID-19 Sanitary Cues on Hedonic Appreciation of Foods.

Jarina Gabrielle Aquino Oliveira, Adriana Conceição Soares Sampaio, Olivia Morgan Lapenta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jarina Gabrielle Aquino OliveiraPsychological Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Investigation in Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Adriana Conceição Soares SampaioPsychological Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Investigation in Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Olivia Morgan LapentaPsychological Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Investigation in Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-4190
University of Minho · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/72710/2010Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/PSI/01662/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to several lifestyle changes, including eating behavior. Herein, we aimed to evaluate how pandemic-related sanitary cues presented in food videos impact food appraisal and desire to eat, and their priming after-effects on subsequent food pictures presented without such cues. In two online sessions, separated by 4 to 7 days, participants watched either a Non-Pandemic or a Pandemic video of a woman eating, the latter containing sanitary elements adopted during the pandemic. The order of the videos was counterbalanced across participants over the two experimental sessions. Videos were followed by images of food from different categories. After observing both videos and each picture, participants were instructed to evaluate the visual aspect, expected smell and flavor, and rate their desire to eat. Our study demonstrated (1) higher hedonic responses to the Non-Pandemic compared to the Pandemic video, (2) a priming effect showing higher appreciation for sweet foods after the Non-Pandemic compared to the Pandemic video, (3) that food exposure gradually increases one's desire to eat, but such effects are impacted by pandemic sanitary cues, and (4) greater hedonic responses are given for sweet and high-calorie foods compared to salty and low-calorie ones, irrespective of pandemic priming. Finally, depression and anxiety symptoms were associated with lower smell evaluations only in the Pandemic condition.

Indexed as

COVID-19dietary preferenceseating behaviorfood choicemultisensory food perception

Identifiers

PMID35741951
PMCPMC9222980
OpenAlexW4282946233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.