Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741660›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Ultrasound-Mediated Bioeffects in Senescent Mice and Alzheimer's Mouse Models.

Matilde Balbi, Daniel G Blackmore, Pranesh Padmanabhan, Jürgen Götz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Engineering Versatile Nanomedicines for Ultrasonic Tumor Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matilde BalbiQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4590-5447
Daniel G BlackmoreQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Pranesh PadmanabhanQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jürgen GötzQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-7896

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia GNT1145580National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia GNT1176326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is routinely used for a wide range of diagnostic imaging applications. However, given that ultrasound can operate over a wide range of parameters that can all be modulated, its applicability extends far beyond the bioimaging field. In fact, the modality has emerged as a hybrid technology that effectively assists drug delivery by transiently opening the blood-brain barrier (BBB) when combined with intravenously injected microbubbles, and facilitates neuromodulation. Studies in aged mice contributed to an insight into how low-intensity ultrasound brings about its neuromodulatory effects, including increased synaptic plasticity and improved cognitive functions, with a potential role for neurogenesis and the modulation of NMDA receptor-mediated neuronal signalling. This work is complemented by studies in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (AD), a form of pathological ageing. Here, ultrasound was mainly employed as a BBB-opening tool that clears protein aggregates via microglial activation and neuronal autophagy, thereby restoring cognition. We discuss the currently available ultrasound approaches and how studies in senescent mice are relevant for AD and can accelerate the application of low-intensity ultrasound in the clinic.

Indexed as

amyloidlong-term potentiationlow-intensity ultrasoundmechanosensory receptorneurogenesisneuromodulationNMDA receptor (NR)senescenceTau

Identifiers

PMID35741660
PMCPMC9221310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.