ArticleBrain sciences2022
Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Patients with Brain Injury.
Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07406555 (Differences in C-Reactive Protein Levels Between Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Receiving Dexmedetomidine and Those Not Receiving Dexmedetomidine Undergoing Craniotomy at Prof. Dr. Margono Soekarjo Regional General Hospital, Purwokerto), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Differences in C-Reactive Protein Levels Between Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Receiving Dexmedetomidine and Those Not Receiving Dexmedetomidine Undergoing Craniotomy at Prof. Dr. Margono Soekarjo Regional General Hospital, Purwokerto
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of GHOST-CAP strategy combined with multimodal monitoring in the treatment of a patient with polytrauma complicated by severe traumatic brain injury: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Dexmedetomidine on Hospital and Intensive Care Unit Stay Duration in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Systematic Review.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2025Review
- Dexmedetomidine-mediated sleep phase modulation ameliorates motor and cognitive performance in a chronic blast-injured mouse model.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies have shown that dexmedetomidine improves neurological function. Whether dexmedetomidine reduces mortality or improves quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) among patients post-craniotomy remains unclear.
methodsThis single-center randomized study was conducted prospectively from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. Patients who were transferred to the ICU after craniotomy within 24 h were included. The analgesic was titrated to a Critical care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) score ≤2, and the sedative was titrated to a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score ≤-3 for at least 24 h. The qEEG signals were collected by four electrodes (F3, T3, F4, and T4 according to the international 10/20 EEG electrode practice). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality and qEEG results on day 1 and day 3 after sedation.
resultsOne hundred and fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 77 were in the dexmedetomidine group and 74 in the midazolam group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in mortality at 28 days (14.3% vs. 24.3%;
conclusionCompared with midazolam, dexmedetomidine did not lead to a lower 28-day mortality or better qEEG results in brain injury patients after a craniotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.