Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741619›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Neuroscience Knowledge and Endorsement of Neuromyths among Educators: What Is the Scenario in Brazil?

Estefania Simoes, Adriana Foz, Fernanda Petinati, Alcione Marques, Joao Sato, Guilherme Lepski, Analía Arévalo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuroscience Exposure as a Predictor of Teaching Self-Efficacy.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Estefania SimoesCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2842-5030
Adriana FozDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04021-001, Brazil.
Fernanda PetinatiDepartment of Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-903, Brazil.
Alcione MarquesDepartment of Collective Health, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.
Joao SatoCenter for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, Santo André 09210-580, Brazil.
Guilherme LepskiDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.
Analía ArévaloDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3793-8081
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of neuroscience has seen significant growth and interest in recent decades. While neuroscience knowledge can benefit laypeople as well as professionals in many different areas, it may be particularly relevant for educators. With the right information, educators can apply neuroscience-based teaching strategies as well as protect themselves and their students against pseudoscientific ideas and products based on them. Despite rapidly growing sources of available information and courses, studies show that educators in many countries have poor knowledge of brain science and tend to endorse education-related neuromyths. Poor English skills and fewer resources (personal, institutional and governmental) may be additional limitations in Latin America. In order to better understand the scenario in Latin America's largest country, we created an anonymous online survey which was answered by 1634 individuals working in education from all five regions of Brazil. Respondents stated whether they agreed with each statement and reported their level of confidence for each answer. Significant differences in performance were observed across regions, between educators living in capital cities versus the outskirts, between those teaching in private versus public schools, and among educators teaching different levels (pre-school up to college/university). We also observed high endorsement of some key neuromyths, even among groups who performed better overall. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct a detailed analysis of the profile of a large group of educators in Brazil. We discuss our findings in terms of efforts to better understand regional and global limitations and develop methods of addressing these most efficiently.

Indexed as

fake newsneuroeducationneuromythspseudosciencescience educationscience literacy

Identifiers

PMID35741619
PMCPMC9221520
OpenAlexW4281854780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.