Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741426›Full record

ReviewBiology2022

Collagen Extraction from Animal Skin.

Andrea Marie E Matinong, Yusuf Chisti, Kim L Pickering, Richard G Haverkamp

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Rakkyo (Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  7. Genetic Association Analysis of Skin Traits and theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Valorization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Marie E MatinongSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5267-7978
Yusuf ChistiSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.
Kim L PickeringSchool of Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2694-4432
Richard G HaverkampSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3890-7105
Massey University · NZUniversity of Waikato · NZ

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, New Zealand Government UOWX2004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen is the most abundant structural protein in animals. It is the major component of skin. It finds uses in cosmetics, medicine, yarn production and packaging. This paper reviews the extraction of collagen from hides of most consumed animals for meat with the focus on literature published since 2000. The different pretreatment and extraction techniques that have been investigated for producing collagen from animal skins are reviewed. Pretreatment by enzymatic, acid or alkaline methods have been used. Extraction by chemical hydrolysis, salt solubilization, enzymatic hydrolysis, ultrasound assisted extraction and other methods are described. Post-extraction purification methods are also explained. This compilation will be useful for anyone wishing to use collagen as a resource and wanting to further improve the extraction and purification methods.

Indexed as

collagenextractionskin

Identifiers

PMID35741426
PMCPMC9219788
OpenAlexW4282586635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.