ReviewBiology2022
The Dual Role of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles in Carcinogenesis.
Review in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-free therapeutics for non-healing wounds: role of MSC-derived exosomes in macrophage polarization, angiogenesis, and fibroblast-mediated ECM remodeling-bridging preclinical insights to clinical translation.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Extruded nanovesicles derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells exhibit No tumorigenic potential.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells and their extracellular vesicle therapy for neurological disorders: traumatic brain injury and beyond.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Theranostic Role of Advanced Nanotechnological Tools in Early Brain Metastases in Lung Cancer: An Updated Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Hallmarks of cancer resistance.iScience · 2024Review
- Identification and validation of tumor microenvironment-related signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Natural and Cytochalasin B-Induced Membrane Vesicles from Tumor Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a major component of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and play an important role in tumor progression. MSCs remodel the extracellular matrix, participate in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, promote the spread of metastases, and inhibit antitumor immune responses in the TME; however, there are also data pertaining to the antitumor effects of MSCs. MSCs activate the cell death mechanism by modulating the expression of proteins involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, angiogenesis receptors, and proapoptotic proteins. One of the main ways in which MSCs and TME interact is through the production of extracellular vesicles (EVs) by cells. Currently, data on the effects of both MSCs and their EVs on tumor cells are rather contradictory. Various studies have reported that EVs from MSCs can have either antitumor or pro-tumor effects, depending on both the tumor type and developmental stage. In this review, we discuss published data on EV MSCs and their effect on tumor cells. The molecular composition of vesicles obtained from MSCs is also presented in the review. In addition, the use of EV MSCs for the development of new methods for treating oncological diseases is described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.