ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Predicting Visual Acuity in Patients Treated for AMD.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The leading diagnostic tool in modern ophthalmology, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), is not yet able to establish the evolution of retinal diseases. Our task is to forecast the progression of retinal diseases by means of machine learning technologies. The aim is to help the ophthalmologist to determine when early treatment is needed in order to prevent severe vision impairment or even blindness. The acquired data are made up of sequences of visits from multiple patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which, if not treated at the appropriate time, may result in irreversible blindness. The dataset contains 94 patients with AMD and there are 161 eyes included with more than one medical examination. We used various techniques from machine learning (linear regression, gradient boosting, random forest and extremely randomised trees, bidirectional recurrent neural network, LSTM network, GRU network) to handle technical challenges such as how to learn from small-sized time series, how to handle different time intervals between visits, and how to learn from different numbers of visits for each patient (1-5 visits). For predicting the visual acuity, we performed several experiments with different features. First, by considering only previous measured visual acuity, the best accuracy of 0.96 was obtained based on a linear regression. Second, by considering numerical OCT features such as previous thickness and volume values in all retinal zones, the LSTM network reached the highest score (R2=0.99). Third, by considering the fundus scan images represented as embeddings obtained from the convolutional autoencoder, the accuracy was increased for all algorithms. The best forecasting results for visual acuity depend on the number of visits and features used for predictions, i.e., 0.99 for LSTM based on three visits (monthly resampled series) based on numerical OCT values, fundus images, and previous visual acuities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.