Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741267›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Deep Transfer Learning for the Multilabel Classification of Chest X-ray Images.

Guan-Hua Huang, Qi-Jia Fu, Ming-Zhang Gu, Nan-Han Lu, Kuo-Ying Liu, Tai-Been Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guan-Hua HuangInstitute of Statistics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-3855
Qi-Jia FuInstitute of Statistics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.
Ming-Zhang GuInstitute of Statistics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.
Nan-Han LuDepartment of Pharmacy, Tajen University, Pingtung City 90741, Taiwan.
Kuo-Ying LiuDepartment of Radiology, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan.
Tai-Been ChenInstitute of Statistics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3348-4422

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 107-2118-M-009-005-MY2 and MOST 109-2118-M-009-004-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest X-ray (CXR) is widely used to diagnose conditions affecting the chest, its contents, and its nearby structures. In this study, we used a private data set containing 1630 CXR images with disease labels; most of the images were disease-free, but the others contained multiple sites of abnormalities. Here, we used deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models to extract feature representations and to identify possible diseases in these images. We also used transfer learning combined with large open-source image data sets to resolve the problems of insufficient training data and optimize the classification model. The effects of different approaches of reusing pretrained weights (model finetuning and layer transfer), source data sets of different sizes and similarity levels to the target data (ImageNet, ChestX-ray, and CheXpert), methods integrating source data sets into transfer learning (initiating, concatenating, and co-training), and backbone CNN models (ResNet50 and DenseNet121) on transfer learning were also assessed. The results demonstrated that transfer learning applied with the model finetuning approach typically afforded better prediction models. When only one source data set was adopted, ChestX-ray performed better than CheXpert; however, after ImageNet initials were attached, CheXpert performed better. ResNet50 performed better in initiating transfer learning, whereas DenseNet121 performed better in concatenating and co-training transfer learning. Transfer learning with multiple source data sets was preferable to that with a source data set. Overall, transfer learning can further enhance prediction capabilities and reduce computing costs for CXR images.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learningsource data setsupervised classification

Identifiers

PMID35741267
PMCPMC9222116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.