ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Deep Transfer Learning for the Multilabel Classification of Chest X-ray Images.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical Deep Learning for Abnormality Classification in Mouse Skeleton Using Multiview X-Ray Images: Convolutional Autoencoders Versus ConvNeXt.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Deep Convolutional Neural Networks on Multiclass Classification of Three-Dimensional Brain Images for Parkinson's Disease Stage Prediction.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- OCTDL: Optical Coherence Tomography Dataset for Image-Based Deep Learning Methods.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Development and External Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Method for Scalable Chest Radiograph Diagnosis: A Multi-Country Cross-Sectional Study.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Predicting intensive care need for COVID-19 patients using deep learning on chest radiography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Optimal Combination of Mother Wavelet and AI Model for Precise Classification of Pediatric Electroretinogram Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A real-time automated bone age assessment system based on the RUS-CHN method.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Editorial on Special Issue "Artificial Intelligence in Image-Based Screening, Diagnostics, and Clinical Care of Cardiopulmonary Diseases".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chest X-ray (CXR) is widely used to diagnose conditions affecting the chest, its contents, and its nearby structures. In this study, we used a private data set containing 1630 CXR images with disease labels; most of the images were disease-free, but the others contained multiple sites of abnormalities. Here, we used deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models to extract feature representations and to identify possible diseases in these images. We also used transfer learning combined with large open-source image data sets to resolve the problems of insufficient training data and optimize the classification model. The effects of different approaches of reusing pretrained weights (model finetuning and layer transfer), source data sets of different sizes and similarity levels to the target data (ImageNet, ChestX-ray, and CheXpert), methods integrating source data sets into transfer learning (initiating, concatenating, and co-training), and backbone CNN models (ResNet50 and DenseNet121) on transfer learning were also assessed. The results demonstrated that transfer learning applied with the model finetuning approach typically afforded better prediction models. When only one source data set was adopted, ChestX-ray performed better than CheXpert; however, after ImageNet initials were attached, CheXpert performed better. ResNet50 performed better in initiating transfer learning, whereas DenseNet121 performed better in concatenating and co-training transfer learning. Transfer learning with multiple source data sets was preferable to that with a source data set. Overall, transfer learning can further enhance prediction capabilities and reduce computing costs for CXR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.