ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Deep Modality-Specific Ensemble for Improving Pneumonia Detection in Chest X-rays.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data-driven machine learning algorithm model for pneumonia prediction and determinant factor stratification among children aged 6-23 months in Ethiopia.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Ensembled YOLO for multiorgan detection in chest x-rays.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Pneumonia Detection in Chest X-ray Images: A Comprehensive Survey.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Analysis of Chest X-ray for COVID-19 Diagnosis as a Use Case for an HPC-Enabled Data Analysis and Machine Learning Platform for Medical Diagnosis Support.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Editorial on Special Issue "Artificial Intelligence in Image-Based Screening, Diagnostics, and Clinical Care of Cardiopulmonary Diseases".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pneumonia is an acute respiratory infectious disease caused by bacteria, fungi, or viruses. Fluid-filled lungs due to the disease result in painful breathing difficulties and reduced oxygen intake. Effective diagnosis is critical for appropriate and timely treatment and improving survival. Chest X-rays (CXRs) are routinely used to screen for the infection. Computer-aided detection methods using conventional deep learning (DL) models for identifying pneumonia-consistent manifestations in CXRs have demonstrated superiority over traditional machine learning approaches. However, their performance is still inadequate to aid in clinical decision-making. This study improves upon the state of the art as follows. Specifically, we train a DL classifier on large collections of CXR images to develop a CXR modality-specific model. Next, we use this model as the classifier backbone in the RetinaNet object detection network. We also initialize this backbone using random weights and ImageNet-pretrained weights. Finally, we construct an ensemble of the best-performing models resulting in improved detection of pneumonia-consistent findings. Experimental results demonstrate that an ensemble of the top-3 performing RetinaNet models outperformed individual models in terms of the mean average precision (mAP) metric (0.3272, 95% CI: (0.3006,0.3538)) toward this task, which is markedly higher than the state of the art (mAP: 0.2547). This performance improvement is attributed to the key modifications in initializing the weights of classifier backbones and constructing model ensembles to reduce prediction variance compared to individual constituent models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.