Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741247›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Novel Methods to Measure Height and Volume in Healthy and Degenerated Lumbar Discs in MRIs: A Reliability Assessment Study.

Nadya Guellil, Neha Argawal, Magnus Krieghoff, Ingmar Kaden, Christian Hohaus, Hans-Joerg Meisel, Philipp Schenk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadya GuellilDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Burn Unit, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Neha ArgawalDepartment of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Magnus KrieghoffInstitute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Ingmar KadenInstitute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Christian HohausDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Dessau, 06847 Dessau, Germany.
Hans-Joerg MeiselDepartment of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Philipp SchenkDepartment of Science and Research, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, 06112 Halle, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the regeneration and therapy of degenerated intervertebral discs, the height, volume or categorizing assessments, such as Pfirrmann classification, are used to quantify the discs themselves and the effects of therapy. Here, the question of transferability, in the sense of reliability, of the results arises in the common exchange.

methodsWe have investigated two established and a newly developed (9-point measurement), easy to use methods for height measurement and volume measurement on degenerated and healthy lumbar intervertebral discs of 66 patients regarding inter- and intra-observer reliability.

resultsIn overview, we found very different reliabilities. While the intra-observer reliability showed good to excellent agreement for both healthy and degenerated lumbar discs for the height and volume measurements, the inter-observer reliability was low or moderate in some cases. The 9-point method for height determination consistently showed better reliability for both healthy and degenerated discs, for both intra- and inter-observer reliability, compared to the two established methods.

conclusionsWe recommend using the 9-point measurement as the method to communicate lumbar disc height, both for healthy and degenerated discs. Due to the partly low or moderate reliability, significant differences in the measured heights can already occur, which can lead to a worsened comparability.

Indexed as

degenerated lumbar discdisc heightdisc volumeheight measurementintra- and inter-observer reliabilityvolume measurement

Identifiers

PMID35741247
PMCPMC9221833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.