Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741223›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Diagnostic Potential of Exosomal microRNAs in Colorectal Cancer.

Jonas Dohmen, Alexander Semaan, Makbule Kobilay, Martin Zaleski, Vittorio Branchi, Anja Schlierf, Karina Hettwer, Steffen Uhlig, Gunther Hartmann, Jörg C Kalff and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A new era of cancer immunotherapy: vaccines and miRNAs.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. MicroRNA Gets a Mighty Award.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonas DohmenDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Alexander SemaanDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-3217
Makbule KobilayInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Martin ZaleskiInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Vittorio BranchiDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-835X
Anja SchlierfQuoData GmbH-Quality & Statistics, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Karina HettwerQuoData GmbH-Quality & Statistics, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Steffen UhligQuoData GmbH-Quality & Statistics, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Gunther HartmannInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Hanno MatthaeiDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Philipp LingohrDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Stefan HoldenriederInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 13N12852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the significance of colonoscopy for early diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), population-wide screening remains challenging, mainly because of low acceptance rates. Herein, exosomal (exo-miR) and free circulating microRNA (c-miR) may be used as liquid biopsies in CRC to identify individuals at risk. Direct comparison of both compartments has shown inconclusive results, which is why we directly compared a panel of 10 microRNAs in this entity. Methods: Exo-miR and c-miR levels were measured using real-time quantitative PCR after isolation from serum specimens in a cohort of 69 patients. Furthermore, results were compared to established tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9. Results: Direct comparison of exo- and c-miR biopsy results showed significantly higher microRNA levels in the exosomal compartment (p < 0.001). Exo-Let7, exo-miR-16 and exo-miR-23 significantly differed between CRC and healthy controls (all p < 0.05), while no c-miR showed this potential. Sensitivity and specificity can be further enhanced using combinations of multiple exosomal miRNAs. Conclusions: Exosomal microRNA should be considered as a promising biomarker in CRC for future studies. Nonetheless, results may show interference with common comorbidities, which must be taken into account in future studies.

Indexed as

biomarkercolorectal carcinomaexosomemicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID35741223
PMCPMC9221658
OpenAlexW4281824272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.