Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741209›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Deep-Learning-Based Thrombus Localization and Segmentation in Patients with Posterior Circulation Stroke.

Riaan Zoetmulder, Agnetha A E Bruggeman, Ivana Išgum, Efstratios Gavves, Charles B L M Majoie, Ludo F M Beenen, Diederik W J Dippel, Nikkie Boodt, Sanne J den Hartog, Pieter J van Doormaal and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Riaan ZoetmulderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnetha A E BruggemanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6873-2545
Ivana IšgumDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1869-5034
Efstratios GavvesInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8947-1332
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ludo F M BeenenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9204-1026
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nikkie BoodtDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sanne J den HartogDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter J van DoormaalDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7398-2864
Sandra A P CornelissenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Josje BrouwerDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter J SchonewilleSt. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Anne F V PirsonDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wim H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Christiaan van der LeijDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rutger J B BransDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Adriaan C G M van EsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
MR CLEAN Registry Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thrombus volume in posterior circulation stroke (PCS) has been associated with outcome, through recanalization. Manual thrombus segmentation is impractical for large scale analysis of image characteristics. Hence, in this study we develop the first automatic method for thrombus localization and segmentation on CT in patients with PCS. In this multi-center retrospective study, 187 patients with PCS from the MR CLEAN Registry were included. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) that segments thrombi and restricts the volume-of-interest (VOI) to the brainstem (Polar-UNet). Furthermore, we reduced false positive localization by removing small-volume objects, referred to as volume-based removal (VBR). Polar-UNet is benchmarked against a CNN that does not restrict the VOI (BL-UNet). Performance metrics included the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between automated and manually segmented thrombus volumes, the thrombus localization precision and recall, and the Dice coefficient. The majority of the thrombi were localized. Without VBR, Polar-UNet achieved a thrombus localization recall of 0.82, versus 0.78 achieved by BL-UNet. This high recall was accompanied by a low precision of 0.14 and 0.09. VBR improved precision to 0.65 and 0.56 for Polar-UNet and BL-UNet, respectively, with a small reduction in recall to 0.75 and 0.69. The Dice coefficient achieved by Polar-UNet was 0.44, versus 0.38 achieved by BL-UNet with VBR. Both methods achieved ICCs of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.27-0.54). Restricting the VOI to the brainstem improved the thrombus localization precision, recall, and segmentation overlap compared to the benchmark. VBR improved thrombus localization precision but lowered recall.

Indexed as

CTAdeep learninglocalizationNCCTposterior strokesegmentationthrombus

Identifiers

PMID35741209
PMCPMC9222185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.