Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741189›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Frequency and Consequences of Cervical Lymph Node Overstaging in Head and Neck Carcinoma.

Volker Hans Schartinger, Daniel Dejaco, Natalie Fischer, Anna Lettenbichler-Haug, Maria Anegg, Matthias Santer, Joachim Schmutzhard, Barbara Kofler, Samuel Vorbach, Gerlig Widmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Volker Hans SchartingerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-7644
Daniel DejacoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9176-7415
Natalie FischerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna Lettenbichler-HaugDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Maria AneggDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Matthias SanterDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Joachim SchmutzhardDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Barbara KoflerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Samuel VorbachDepartment of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Gerlig WidmannDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Herbert RiechelmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical lymph node staging in head and neck carcinoma (HNC) is fraught with uncertainties. Established clinical algorithms are available for the problem of occult cervical metastases. Much less is known about clinical lymph node overstaging. We identified HNC patients clinically classified as lymph node positive (cN+), in whom surgical neck dissection (ND) specimens were histopathologically negative (pN0) and in addition the subgroup, in whom an originally planned postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) was omitted. We compared these patients with surgically treated patients with clinically and histopathologically negative neck (cN0/pN0), who had received selective ND. Using a fuzzy matching algorithm, we identified patients with closely similar patient and disease characteristics, who had received primary definitive radiotherapy (RT) with or without systemic therapy (RT ± ST). Of the 980 patients with HNC, 292 received a ND as part of primary treatment. In 128/292 patients with cN0 neck, ND was elective, and in 164 patients with clinically positive neck (cN+), ND was therapeutic. In 43/164 cN+ patients, ND was histopathologically negative (cN+/pN-). In 24 of these, initially planned PORT was omitted. Overall, survival did not differ from the cN0/pN0 and primary RT ± ST control groups. However, more RT ± ST patients had functional problems with nutrition (

Indexed as

computed tomographyhead and neck neoplasmneck dissectiontumor staging

Identifiers

PMID35741189
PMCPMC9221862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.