ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Feasibility of Differential Dose-Volume Histogram Features in Multivariate Prediction Model for Radiation Pneumonitis Occurrence.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive value of machine learning for radiation pneumonitis and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to introduce differential dose−volume histogram (dDVH) features into machine learning for radiation pneumonitis (RP) prediction and to demonstrate the predictive performance of the developed model based on integrated cumulative dose−volume histogram (cDVH) and dDVH features. Materials and methods: cDVH and dDVH features were calculated for 153 patients treated for non-small-cell lung cancer with 60−66 Gy and dose bins ranging from 2 to 8 Gy in 2 Gy increments. RP prediction models were developed with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) through fivefold cross-validation. Results: Among the 152 patients in the patient cohort, 41 presented ≥grade 2 RP. The interdependencies between cDVH features evaluated by Spearman’s correlation were significantly resolved by the inclusion of dDVH features. The average area under curve for the RP prediction model using cDVH and dDVH model was 0.73, which was higher than the average area under curve using cDVH model for 0.62 with statistically significance (p < 0.01). An analysis using the entire set of regression coefficients determined by LASSO demonstrated that dDVH features represented four of the top five frequently selected features in the model fitting, regardless of dose bin. Conclusions: We successfully developed an RP prediction model that integrated cDVH and dDVH features. The best RP prediction model was achieved using dDVH (dose bin = 4 Gy) features in the machine learning process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.