ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Visual Reassessment with Flux-Interval Plot Configuration after Automatic Classification for Accurate Atrial Fibrillation Detection by Photoplethysmography.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is a common type of arrhythmia that is often clinically asymptomatic, which increases the risk of stroke significantly but can be prevented with anticoagulation. The photoplethysmogram (PPG) has recently attracted a lot of attention as a surrogate for electrocardiography (ECG) on atrial fibrillation (AFib) detection, with its out-of-hospital usability for rapid screening or long-term monitoring. Previous studies on AFib detection via PPG signals have achieved good results, but were short of intuitive criteria like ECG p-wave absence or not, especially while using interval randomness to detect AFib suffering from conjunction with premature contractions (PAC/PVC). In this study, we newly developed a PPG flux (pulse amplitude) and interval plots-based methodology, simply comprising an irregularity index threshold of 20 and regression error threshold of 0.06 for the precise automatic detection of AFib. The proposed method with automated detection on AFib shows a combined sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision of 1, 0.995, 0.995, and 0.952 across the 460 samples. Furthermore, the flux-interval plot configuration also acts as a very intuitive tool for visual reassessment to confirm the automatic detection of AFib by its distinctive plot pattern compared to other cardiac rhythms. The study demonstrated that exclusive 2 false-positive cases could be corrected after the reassessment. With the methodology's background theory well established, the detection process automated and visualized, and the PPG sensors already extensively used, this technology is very user-friendly and convincing for promoted to in-house AFib diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.