Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740861›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Hospital Admission in the Latent versus the Active Phase of Labor: Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes.

Viola Seravalli, Noemi Strambi, Enrica Castellana, Maria Alessia Salamina, Chiara Bettini, Mariarosaria Di Tommaso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Cesarean section risk assessment for pregnant women at term].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Viola SeravalliDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Noemi StrambiDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Enrica CastellanaDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Maria Alessia SalaminaDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Chiara BettiniDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Mariarosaria Di TommasoDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 50134 Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Admission in the latent phase of labor has been associated with increased risk of obstetric interventions compared to admission in the active phase. We aimed to investigate the relationship between labor phase at admission and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1005 women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy admitted for spontaneous labor. Cesarean section rate and other perinatal outcomes were compared between women admitted in the latent phase and those admitted in the active phase. Results: Admission occurred in the active phase of labor for 331 women (32.9%) and in the latent phase for 674 (67.1%). Admission in the latent phase was more frequent in nulliparous than in multiparous (p < 0.01) and for Italian patients compared to foreigners. The incidence of caesarean section was similar between groups. Admission in the latent phase increased the likelihood of epidural analgesia (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.96−6.14, in nulliparous, and OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.37−4.84, in multiparous) and increased the rate of augmentation of labor with oxytocin in multiparous (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.05−7.85), without difference in neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: Admission in the latent phase is associated with more frequent use of epidural analgesia, without an increase in cesarean section or adverse neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

caesarean sectionepidural analgesialaborobstetrics interventionphase of labor

Identifiers

PMID35740861
PMCPMC9221807
OpenAlexW4283208524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.