Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740792›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Retrospective Cohort Study on Potential Risk Factors for Repeated Need of Dental Rehabilitation under General Anesthesia in a Private Pediatric Dental Practice.

Viktoria Karl, Konstantin Johannes Scholz, Karl-Anton Hiller, Isabelle Tabenski, Frederike Schenke, Wolfgang Buchalla, Christian Kirschneck, Katrin Bekes, Fabian Cieplik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Viktoria KarlDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Konstantin Johannes ScholzDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4450-4238
Karl-Anton HillerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4726-9555
Isabelle TabenskiPrivate Pediatric Dental Practice "Die Kinderzahnärzte Dr. Schenke & Kolleginnen", 93051 Regensburg, Germany.
Frederike SchenkePrivate Pediatric Dental Practice "Die Kinderzahnärzte Dr. Schenke & Kolleginnen", 93051 Regensburg, Germany.
Wolfgang BuchallaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Christian KirschneckDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9473-8724
Katrin BekesDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5249-0123
Fabian CieplikDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1750-7380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for dental rehabilitations under general anesthesia (DRGAs) is continuously increasing, particularly for dental treatment of children. The present retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate potential risk factors for repeated need of DRGA in a cohort of patients from a private pediatric dental practice. Demographic and anamnestic data, dental status, and treatments performed during DRGA were retrospectively analyzed from the electronic dental charts of 1155 children that received at least one DRGA between October 2016 and December 2021. The median age of all children was 5 years at time of their first DRGA. The rate of repeated DRGAs was 9%. Patients with repeated need of DRGA were significantly younger at time of their first DRGA and revealed significantly more often a history of preterm birth and current use of a baby bottle as compared to patients with only one DRGA. There were significantly fewer treatments (regardless of type) in the second DRGA than at the first. Within the limitations of this study, young age at first DRGA, a history of preterm birth, and current use of a baby bottle may be risk factors for repeated need of DRGA. The search for effective strategies to minimize the repeated need for DRGA in children remains critical.

Indexed as

childrengeneral anesthesiapediatric dentistryrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35740792
PMCPMC9221647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.