ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Acute Rhinosinusitis in Children with Inhalant Allergies.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a Nasal Medical Device (NESOSPRAY HE-G) in Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhinosinusitis is an essential medical problem in pediatric populations. Due to a lack of studies considering allergy impact on pediatric rhinosinusitis, it seems legitimate to investigate this subject. The aim of this paper was to assess the influence of inhalant allergy on acute rhinosinusitis in children. The study involved 100 pediatric patients aged between 3 and 17 years who were admitted to the Chair and Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Phoniatrics and Audiology of the Medical University of Lublin due to acute rhinosinusitis. The control group consisted of 50 children without allergy, and the study group consisted of 50 children suffering from inhalant allergy. The methodology employed in this study involved medical history and laryngological examination, as well as laboratory and radiological testing. Dust mite allergy was the most common allergy among patients in the study group. Patients with allergies presented at the hospital later than patients without allergy, and their hospitalization lasted longer due to more severe sinus disease, higher inflammatory parameters, multiple sinus involvement, more frequent fever or rhinosinusitis complications, especially orbital occurrence. Most children in the control group required only pharmacological treatment. Inhalant allergy, especially dust mite allergy, contributes to more severe acute rhinosinusitis in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.