ArticleCancers2022
Context-Dependent Effects Explain Divergent Prognostic Roles of Tregs in Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polygenic risk scores and plasma proteomics identify cancer-related proteins and trans-regulated protein networks.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- OX40L and IL-2 combination strategy for gastric cancer immunotherapy.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Bispecific Antibody Targeting EpCAM and CD3 for Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Ascites: An Experimental Study.Current medical science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing cancer prognosis is a challenging task, given the heterogeneity of the disease. Multiple features (clinical, environmental, genetic) have been used for such assessments. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is a key feature, and describing the impact of its many components on cancer prognosis is an active field of research. The complexity of the tumor microenvironment context makes it difficult to use the TIME to assess prognosis, as demonstrated by the example of regulatory T cells (Tregs). The effect of Tregs on prognosis is ambiguous, with different studies considering them to be negative, positive or neutral. We focused on five different cancer types (breast, colorectal, gastric, lung and ovarian). We clarified the definition of Tregs and their utility for assessing cancer prognosis by taking the context into account via the following parameters: the Treg subset, the anatomical location of these cells, and the neighboring cells. With a meta-analysis on these three parameters, we were able to clarify the prognostic role of Tregs. We found that CD45RO+ Tregs had a reproducible negative effect on prognosis across cancer types, and we gained insight into the contributions of the anatomical location of Tregs and of their neighboring cells on their prognostic value. Our results suggest that Tregs play a similar prognostic role in all cancer types. We also establish guidelines for improving the design of future studies addressing the pathophysiological role of Tregs in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.