Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740635›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Validation of a Patient-Derived Xenograft Model for Cervical Cancer Based on Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization.

Shunsuke Miyamoto, Tomohito Tanaka, Kensuke Hirosuna, Ruri Nishie, Shoko Ueda, Sousuke Hashida, Shinichi Terada, Hiromi Konishi, Yuhei Kogata, Kohei Taniguchi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shunsuke MiyamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohito TanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4210-701X
Kensuke HirosunaTranslational Research Program, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9263-4929
Ruri NishieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Shoko UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Sousuke HashidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Shinichi TeradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Hiromi KonishiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Yuhei KogataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Kohei TaniguchiTranslational Research Program, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0648-1370
Kazumasa KomuraTranslational Research Program, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Masahide OhmichiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K09838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are useful tools for preclinical drug evaluation, biomarker identification, and personalized medicine strategies, and can be developed by the heterotopic or orthotopic grafting of surgically resected tumors into immunodeficient mice. We report the PDX models of cervical cancer and demonstrate the similarities among original and different generations of PDX tumors. Fresh tumor tissues collected from 22 patients with primary cervical cancer were engrafted subcutaneously into NOD.CB17-PrkdcSCID/J mice. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed to compare primary and different generations of PDX tumors. DNA and RNA sequencing were performed to verify the similarity between the genetic profiles of primary and PDX tumors. Total RNA in extracellular vesicles (EVs) released from primary and PDX tumors was also quantified to evaluate gene expression. The total tumor engraftment rate was 50%. Histologically, no major differences were observed between the original and PDX tumors. Most of the gene mutations and expression patterns related to carcinogenesis and infiltration were similar between the primary tumor and xenograft. Most genes associated with carcinogenesis and infiltration showed similar expression levels in the primary tumor and xenograft EVs. Therefore, compared with primary tumors, PDX models could be potentially more useful for translational research.

Indexed as

cervical cancerDNAextracellular vesiclespatient-derived xenograftRNA

Identifiers

PMID35740635
PMCPMC9221029
OpenAlexW4283074328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.