Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740583›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Dietary Intakes of Animal and Plant Proteins and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: The EPIC-Italy Cohort.

Sabina Sieri, Claudia Agnoli, Valeria Pala, Sara Grioni, Domenico Palli, Benedetta Bendinelli, Alessandra Macciotta, Fulvio Ricceri, Salvatore Panico, Maria Santucci De Magistris and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabina SieriEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5201-172X
Claudia AgnoliEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Valeria PalaEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5438-970X
Sara GrioniEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Domenico PalliInstitute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-2437
Benedetta BendinelliInstitute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50139 Florence, Italy.
Alessandra MacciottaCentre for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health (C-BEPH), Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Fulvio RicceriCentre for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health (C-BEPH), Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8749-9737
Salvatore PanicoDipartimento Di Medicina Clinica E Chirurgia, Federico II University, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Maria Santucci De MagistrisDipartimento Assistenziale Integrale di Medicina Interna ad Indirizzo Specialistico, Azienda Ospedale Universitaria Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Rosario TuminoHyblean Association for Epidemiological Research, AIRE ONLUS, 97100 Ragusa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-414X
Luigi FontanaCharles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Vittorio KroghEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0122-8624
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Turin · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITItalian Association for Cancer Research · ITThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We prospectively investigated the associations of protein intake with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in middle-aged Italian men and women. Food consumption was assessed by validated Epic semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaires. Multivariable Cox models stratified by center, age, and sex, adjusted for confounders, estimated the associations of animal and plant protein consumption with CRC risk by subsite. Among 44,824 men and women, we identified 539 incident CRCs after a median follow-up of 14 years. Replacing animal proteins with plant proteins was associated with a decreased risk of rectal (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92) but not colon cancer. By contrast, replacing animal proteins with plant proteins from high-glycemic-index (GI) foods was associated with an increased risk of proximal and distal (including sigma) colon cancer (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.40) but not when animal proteins were replaced with plant proteins from low-GI foods (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79-1.11). Further evaluation revealed that the increased colon cancer risk was limited to the substitution of proteins from red and processed meat, as well as dairy and eggs, with vegetable proteins from high-GI foods. Participants in the highest quintile of animal protein intake had higher plasma glucose and cholesterol levels than those in the lowest quintile. By contrast, higher intake of plant proteins from low-GI foods was inversely associated with fasting insulin and HOMA-IR levels. In conclusion, replacing animal proteins with plant proteins from high-GI foods was associated with an increased risk of colon cancer.

Indexed as

animal proteincolorectal cancerglycemic indexprotein intakevegetable protein

Identifiers

PMID35740583
PMCPMC9221300
OpenAlexW4282831712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.