ArticleBiomedicines2022
Clinical Implication of Preoperative Renal Function on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk stratification of high-risk muscle invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: multi-institutional study.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Radical nephroureterectomy vs kidney sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in solitary kidney patients: a multi-institutional analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Should follow-up cystoscopy be performed in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma patients managed with radical nephroureterectomy after a five-year bladder tumor-free period?Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative renal function on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RNU between 2000 and 2012 at six academic centers. The patients were stratified into two groups based on preoperative renal function: eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (chronic kidney disease; CKD) and eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (non-CKD). We investigated oncological outcomes, including overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival dichotomized by preoperative renal function. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine if preoperative CKD was associated with oncological outcomes. In total, 1733 patients were eligible for the present study (CKD = 707 and non-CKD = 1026). Significant differences were noted in the clinical and pathologic features among the two groups, including age, sex, tumor localization, pathological T stage, tumor grade, and number of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The estimated five-year overall survival (79.4 vs. 67.5%, log-rank p < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (83.5 vs. 73.6%, log-rank p < 0.001), and progression-free survival (74.6 vs. 61.5%, log-rank p < 0.001) were significantly different between the two groups, longer in the non-CKD group. Upon multivariable analysis, preoperative CKD status was associated with increased risk of overall mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and progression (p = 0.010, p = 0.016, and p = 0.008, respectively). UTUC patients with preoperative CKD had a higher risk of poor overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival after RNU than those without CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.